Advantages and disadvantages of narrow and wide span of control. What are the disadvantages of span of control 2019-02-02

Advantages and disadvantages of narrow and wide span of control Rating: 4,5/10 965 reviews

What Does It Mean for a Manager to Have a Wide Span of Control?

advantages and disadvantages of narrow and wide span of control

Later in the 20th century, flatter organizational structures became more common, and the ideal span of control rose to between 15 and 25, with a corresponding ideal of not more than five management layers in the organization in order to speed up decision-making. Finally, narrow spans also reduce opportunities for the development of management. This was of great importance as these screens form a major part of the display of information in modern combat and civilian aircraft. This gives rise to a tall organizational structure. An easy way to disseminate the status.


Next

Comparison between Wide Spans and Narrow Spans of Management

advantages and disadvantages of narrow and wide span of control

Span of control is of two types: 1. Weaknesses of Wide Control Spans Wide spans of control also mean less personal contact, so a manager may not be able to identify problems in the workforce before they grow into larger difficulties. Experienced, well-trained employees need less supervision, allowing for wider spans of control, while new or untrained personnel call for narrower spans. To authenticate users faster in the domain To authenticate resources gps etc faster for the users Utilization of resources Utilization of network and descreasing the overall traffic in the network. The extent of delegation and the clarity of delegation 6. Advantages: More Delegation of Authority Development of Managers Clear policies Disadvantages: Overloaded supervisors Danger of superiors loss of control Requirement of highly trained managerial personnel Block in decision making.

Next

Span of control

advantages and disadvantages of narrow and wide span of control

Brought to you by Benefits of Wide Control Spans A wide span of control gives a manager a broader knowledge of the workforce. In case of narrow span of management, there are comparatively more growth opportunities for a subordinate as the number of levels is more. In a tall structure, managers form many ranks and each has a small area of control. For example, if one is setting up a manufacturing assembly line, are the advantages of closer relationships between supervisor and employees worth the cost of a small span of control, when there is little justification for a small span of control in an assembly line? Lines of communications get larger with larger span of controls often compounding problems. In such cases, a manager can competently control and oversee many employees. The manager normally gets involved when the staff fails to run the show. Companies choosing to forgo bureaucracy must necessarily adopt wider spans of control.

Next

Span of Management or Span of Control

advantages and disadvantages of narrow and wide span of control

Hence, the employee may be less enthusiastic about the job. The first digital programmable electronic computers were developed during World War two known as the Colossus machines to help decipher encrypted German messages and most likely helped the Allies win World War Two. For these reasons, when projects require a large group of employees, managers must delegate activities to ensure appropriate span of control. Communication through scalar chain has to travel various levels, which not only delays it to reach at appropriate points, but also gets distorted or sometimes missed absolutely. Technology is used to keep team members connected and on the same page.

Next

Span of control: Factors Affecting, Advantages and Disadvantages

advantages and disadvantages of narrow and wide span of control

Existence of a good communication system 7. Factors Determining Span : The determination of span depends upon the number of relationships that can be managed by a superior. Classicists have suggested span of upper and top level from three to seven to eight subordi­nates. Use of objective standards: Reviewing the performance of subordinates can either be done by personal observation or through use of objective standards. The manager normally gets involved when the staff fails to run the show. Uses time that could be used on doing the work instead … of reporting about it.


Next

Wide Span Of Control Advantages Free Essays

advantages and disadvantages of narrow and wide span of control

Narrow would therefore be 3-5, for example an infantry fire team 3. Thirdly, narrow span presents problems in coordination and control, as the top management is much away from the operatives, where the actual work is performed. Lesson Summary Span of control is the number of staff members that report to a manager. The degree to which objective standards are established 5. First, the levels are very expensive because they require more supervisory staff, which leads to larger expenses in the form of executive remuneration. Can be misleading of condensed wrongly. This gives rise to a flat organizational structure.


Next

What are the disadvantages of wide span of control

advantages and disadvantages of narrow and wide span of control

When too many people report to a single manager, his job becomes impossible. Such control requires narrower spans -- and a management bureaucracy -- compared with companies that give employees greater freedom. In the team organizational structure, for instance, a small-business owner would organize employees into teams that hold authority over certain projects or work outcomes. The larger the span of control the more time managers often s … pend on reactive tasks involved with staff within the span of control rather than strategic or proactive tasks storing up problems for the future. This is illustrated in the following diagram highlighting the difference between tall and flat organizations.

Next

What are the advantages and disadvantages of narrow span of control

advantages and disadvantages of narrow and wide span of control

The less geographically scattered the subordinates are, the better it is to have a wide span of management as it would be feasible for managers to be in touch with the subordinates and to explain them how to efficiently perform the tasks. His study was not based upon empirical observation, but rather upon theoretical projection by mathematics. Narrow would therefore be 3-5, for example an infantry fire team 3. In a company with only 100 employees, though, supervising 30 of those would be a relatively wide span of control. Wide would be 7-9 as in some business teams. On the other hand, in a research and development department, where a supervisor is expected to foster creativity and promote employee growth, the cost of having a small span of control might pay off in the form of new and lucrative ideas. With physical work as opposed to abstract work, such as shop floor work in a factory, span can sometimes be increased to as much as 30 without a productivity loss because outputs are predetermined.


Next