This is because the law should apply to everyone equally. It is extremely crucial for the judicial system to understand the underlying cause that led to the crime in the first place. Burning Women found guilty of either treason or petty treason were sentenced to be burned alive at the stake. The death penalty should not be argued for from the standpoint of being a deterent, because it is not. Those who kill should be killed. Teaching children to cook healthy foods for themselves and banning junk foods and fizzy drinks in schools can solve this problem. On the whole, I agree with both these views, but my personal view is that minor crimes should have fixed punishment but major crimes deserve through investigation.
Hope and reassurance can be displayed, when, judging others, no. Amidst all the destruction and horrific violence, only books become a source of comfort for her. Thinking about various factors is essential for criminals to live with their sins. Another important point is, this type of punishment helps to reduce the time of court procedures enormously. On the other hand, the other group of society argues that where the felony stems from must be investigated and the motivation should be taken into consideration when sentencing a criminal. One of those methods is to judge with fixed punishment for each type of crime, however, there are people who stand against such measures. Consequently, this kind of cases should be examined thoroughly in order to avoid injustice.
With the rapid development of society, there are a great number of difficult to the nation management. It has always been debatable whether a criminal should get a fixed punishment or circumstances need to be considered before a certain punishment is given. I believe we are down to just treason, homicide, and rape with additional bodily harm. Accordingly, such mentioned factors should be detectable on the level of punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Supporters of fixed punishment strongly. On the contrary, it is not just the responsibility of the judicial system to punish the criminals but to also help control the crime rates to begin with.
Personally, I prefer the way in which the punishment is decided on a case-by-case basis. They never say why it is wrong. If they floated, they were considered guilty and burnt at the stake. They might lie about or fake symptoms, hurt themselves to bring on symptoms, or alter diagnostic tests. In my opinion, there is lots of evidence to support the view that we should fix punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken in to account when deciding on the punishment.
Essay topic: Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Branding with hot irons Hot irons were used to burn letters onto the skin of offenders hand, arm or cheek. However, medical help is critical for preventing serious injury and even death caused by the self-harm typical of Munchausen syndrome. But nature and intentions behind each crime may be different. This system of fixing punishment can also promote a wrong message in public. Write down the key ideas as short as possible.
Similarly, a first time offender should not be treated the same as a repeat offender. You should be able to demonstrate your capability in using English. Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, or chairman Mao committed the murder of millions Stalin likening it to being no different to mowing a lawn. Munchausen syndrome is related to Munchausen syndrome by proxy, which refers to the abuse of another person, typically a child, in order to seek attention or sympathy for the abuser. Environmental problems are rapidly increasing all over the world. If someone is convicted and later found innocent you can release him from prison, but obviously not from the grave.
Discuss both of these two views and give your own opinion. Some people say that we should decide the punishment after only thinking what crimes criminals committed. These attitudes persist as do murder rates, the latter of which is not affected by the existence of capital punishment. The book of Laviticus stresses behavior and how people must be sure that they follow good conduct in order to please God. In my opinion, each man or woman, which committed a crime should be considered individually according with the circumstances and motivations. Other, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. The stocks sitting Stocks were used in the same way as the pillory, except that with stocks, the feet were bound.
No matter who you are either a president or an ordinary person , where you are from or what colour of skin you have, all offenders should be treated the same. It is evident that this method is soft against real criminals as they probably commit the crime considering all the weakness of this method, in other words they plan their crime. This essay will discuss the causes of obesity and offer some solutions. Others, however, argue that circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Such man cannot be justified and must be punished according with the strong measures of the law.
That said, aside from whether these unlawful offenders manage to rehabilitate themselves, the fact that after the incarceration, the most hardened murderers and thugs are at liberty again raises doubts about the effectiveness of law and may lead certain individuals to think that they are practically unpunishable. At present, most schools focus on important academic subjects such as mathematics, science and language. You don't believe you could get a good grade without introduction, do you? Rather it should be argued that the punishment must fit the crime. On other hand, it is sometimes suggested that circumstances and motivation need to be measured before penalize people. For example, a person who steals something from a shop for the first time should not be treated in the same way as a repeat offender who has been caught shoplifting many times before. In fact, I have never met anyone who found it difficult to use a bank account.
When looking at the death penalty system in action, we can clearly see that the only purpose it serves is retribution or revenge; it is seriously flawed in application. Raskolnikov also strives to be an extraordinary being, similar to Napoleon, believing that murder is permissible in pursuit of a higher purpose. To sum up, as the proverb says every cloud has a silver lining, therefore in my opinion the given methods seem like a paradox. Consider Saudi Arabia, ranked as the country with the lowest crime index in the world. Others, however, argue that circumstances of the individual crime and the motivation of committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. In Texas, an attempted crime is one grade lower than if the crime had been committed.