For there are times when people individuals want to be told what to do. That means workers tend to not take ownership of the work they do because there is no incentive to do so. The autocrat pushes employees hard; often, he does not get loyalty and long-term commitments in return. Autocratic Leadership This aggressive leadership style is based on control. The style has some major benefits in creative environments, but it also lacks discipline and structure that is often required in a business environment.
It leads to quick decision-making, control over the processes and the operations of a company, etc. For organizations, this can mean enhanced efficiency and speed. Like the father of a mid-century nuclear family, the boss looks out for his employees, guides their work and expects them to please him by completing their work according to his directives. This leadership style is unsuited to build trusting relationships. You might say it is a request that induces compliance or obedience.
That's not always a good thing, as you will still need to work hard and learn some hard lessons. Team members who are proactive and knowledgeable about their job may find it hard to operate in a work environment which provides them little room for self-innovation and initiative. On the other hand, the employees with the passion and desire to be heard and to highlight their talent will generally move away from the autocratic organization. One ruler called used the tactic of taking land away from the wealthy and providing it for the peasants. Operation is paralyzed when the leader is absent. Schaeffer came in with the simple goal: to turn things around.
Below is a set of must-have characteristics and skills that can make the style easier to master. While autocratic leaders are in charge of the decisions, listening to other opinions or reading more about the topics in question will broaden your understanding and make it easier to make those crucial decisions. If there is a short-term budgetary problem or a large number of positions left unfilled, an autocratic leader can immediately bring their expertise to the situation and manage the problem. Sometimes, a nimble, decision-making process is required to move forward. Some projects require to get things accomplished quickly and efficiently. Other Leadership Styles in Management Many more leadership styles exist, and a really effective leader is adaptable and capable of executing multiple styles in a manner that best fits their current situation. This skill set comes naturally to some leaders, but requires years of practice for others.
Second, you can develop your confidence. One third 33% of employees whether they would stay with their company long-term after their first week. That makes it almost impossible for leaders to leave the workplace, as workers can become so dependent on their decision-making abilities that nothing gets done if the leader is not present for some reason. This can decrease employee morale, and can put all blame on the leader, even an error if it is not his or her fault. Also known as the authoritarian leadership theory, the autocratic leadership theory involves taking charge of the group in the same way a dictator might take control of a country.
While the system is rather rigid, it does require a balance of benefits to guarantee workers are motivated. This feature is optional and can be turned off. Leadership as psychophysiological activation of group members: A case experimental study. These bosses try to not interfere with their employees, passing on the responsibility of decision making to their subordinates. However, the extra time necessary for this process often leads to decisions that ultimately benefit everyone to a greater degree than faster decisions that are more limited in scope. He centralized decision-making, and killed stories at will.
Image Credit: Howell Raines of New York Times In the past, the New York Times ranks among the top companies with autocratic leadership. Conclusion There are occasions or situations where a centralized control is needed in order to achieve the desired result or performance. If you like being in charge and have a grand vision that you want others to implement, you may be an autocratic leader. An autocratic leader must be determined and driven. The word has Greek roots, with the word reflecting independent and self-sustaining power. Enhancing the ability to communicate starts with understanding each of the components of the communication process.
Just as a house cannot stand without a strong foundation, so it is with leadership. In June, however, Germany incited the Austrian Nazis to civil war. Great leaders are genuinely interested in positive results and in the betterment of everyone around them. While those who rely on this approach to heavily are often seen as bossy or dictator-like, this level of control can have benefits and be useful in certain situations. Group members are not allowed to be in positions of leadership, so all rests with the authoritarian leader. A solid autocratic system creates clearly defined guidelines and rules, with the decisions being in the hands of the leader. Over time, however, this leadership style creates mistrust within the workplace.
Instead of there being a democratic process for teams, there are no group positions of leadership with the autocratic style. On the other hand, use of bureaucratic leadership mainly depends on the hierarchy of the organization by clearly defining responsibilities and authorities. It can enhance decision-making and make the operational aspects of a business run smoother. This can often point out strengths or weaknesses to the approach that would have gone unobserved and thus unresolved without this type of participatory brainstorming and decision making. They are severely limited in their ability to perform in an inspiring or creative manner. But during high stress times, the leadership style can provide relief for other industries and organizations as well. Eventually, his behavior caused employee dissention and lowered morale, resulting in a decline of the quality and quantity of information, both of which are critical in a newspaper office.